NOT OUT Rishabh Pant Controversial Mumbai Test Dismissal Sparks Debate: Was the Indian Star Robbed by the Third Umpire?”
![NOT OUT Rishabh Pant ?](https://worldlast24hr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/img_2431-1-1024x1024.jpg)
NOT OUT Rishabh Pant ?
Rishabh Pant was dismissed by Ajaz Patel after scoring a brisk 64 off 57 balls in the Mumbai Test, a decision that sparked controversy. Following his dismissal, Pant engaged in a heated exchange with the umpires, as he appeared frustrated with the call, leaving fans divided over whether the Indian wicketkeeper had been treated fairly.
![NOT OUT Rishabh Pant ?](https://worldlast24hr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/img_2432-1-1024x606.jpg)
Rohit Sharma :
In the post-match press conference, Rohit Sharma expressed his confusion and frustration over Rishabh Pant’s controversial dismissal. “Honestly, I don’t know. If we say something, it isn’t accepted well. If there is no conclusive evidence, the decision should stand with the on-field umpire. That’s what I’ve been told, so I’m not sure how the decision was overturned. The bat was clearly close to the pad,” Rohit stated.
He added, “I don’t know if it’s right for me to talk about it—it’s something for the umpires to consider. Just apply the same rules to every team; don’t keep changing your mind. That dismissal was crucial for us. Rishabh was looking really good, and it felt like he could take us through. But it was an unfortunate call, and we were bowled out soon after.”
Not Out:
Ajaz Patel claimed the critical wicket of Rishabh Pant following a tense review process that shifted the momentum decisively in New Zealand’s favor. The dismissal unfolded when Pant charged down the pitch but missed the ball’s line, with the turning delivery glancing off his pad and landing directly in keeper Tom Blundell’s gloves.
Table of Contents
Ajaz and the New Zealand players erupted in a loud appeal, but umpire Richard Illingworth initially remained unmoved. However, after a brief discussion, captain Tom Latham decided to go for the DRS, setting off a dramatic series of replays. UltraEdge showed a faint spike as the ball passed close to Pant’s bat, leading third umpire Paul Reiffel to overturn the on-field decision, ruling that Pant had made contact with the ball. A visibly frustrated Pant briefly exchanged words with the umpires before walking off, unconvinced by the decision. readmore www.worldlast24hr.com